MDRD, CKD-Epi and Creatinine Clearance with 24-Hour Urine Collection Results in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Authors

  • Siti Nurul Hapsari Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya
  • Leonita Anniwati Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v27i1.1628

Keywords:

Chronic kidney disease, glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, eGFR

Abstract

Kidney disease is a global public health problem, affecting over 750 million people worldwide. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR), which is calculated by measuring the creatinine clearance with 24-hour urine collection (CC) can be inaccurate due to improper urine collection, causing the need for an easier and accurate method of calculation. This study was an observational analytical cross-sectional research using consecutive retrospective sampling. Samples were data of patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) who underwent CC test at the Clinical Pathology Laboratory of the Dr. Soetomo Hospital Surabaya during September-October 2018. Data were compared with the results of Cockcroft-Gault (CG), MDRD, and CKD-Epi formula, and were analyzed using the one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, paired T-test, and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Correlation of CC results with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi results was tested with Spearman's rho and Bland Altman test. The difference test of CC with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi showed results of (p=0.000), (p=0.194), and (p=0.468), respectively. There were significant differences between CC compared to CG, but not MDRD and CKD-Epi. There was a moderate correlation between CG, MDRD, CKD-Epi, and CC with r=0.529; 0.448, and 0.463, respectively. The most compatible formula was CKD-Epi. The measurement of GFR with CC correlated with CG, MDRD, and CKD-Epi; therefore, they could be used as an alternative method to calculate GFR. Further experiments using an exogenous marker should be performed to determine a suitable eGFR formula according to the degree of damage to the kidney. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Siti Nurul Hapsari, Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya

Leonita Anniwati, Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Airlangga University/Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya

References

Skorecki K, Greens J, Brenner B. Chronic renal failure. Harrisons principles of internal medicine. 16 Ed., New York, Mc Graw Hill, 2005; 1653.

Crews DC, Bello AK, Saadi G. World kidney day editorial-burden, access, and disparities in kidney

disease. J Bras Nefrol, 2019; 41(1): 1-9.

Jager KJ, Frase SDS. The ascending rank of chronic kidney disease in the global burden of disease study. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2017; 32(suppl_2): ii121-ii128.

Gounden V, Bhatt H, Jialal I. Renal function tests. StatPearls Publishing. 2019. Available from:

https:/www.ncbi.nlm,nih,giv/books/NBK507821 (accessed 20 September, 2020).

Florkowski CM, Janice Sc Chew-Harris. Methods of estimating GFR-different equations including

CKD-Epi. Clin Biochem Rev, 2011; 32(2): 75-9.

National Kidney Foundation. Frequently asked questions about GFR estimates. https://www.kidney.

org/sites/default/files/12-10-4004 FAQ-ABE.pdf. 2017. (accessed 20 July, 2019)

Kidney Disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) CKD work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice

guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl, 2013; 3(1):

–150.

American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care for patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 2001; 24: S33-S43.

Ferreira JP, Girerd N, Pellicori P, Duarte K, Girerd S, et al. Renal function estimation and Cockcroft–Gault formulas for predicting cardiovascular mortality in population-based, cardiovascular risk, heart failure, and post-myocardial infarction cohorts: The Heart 'OMics' in AGEing (HOMAGE) and the high-risk myocardial infarction database initiatives. BMC Medicine, 2016; 14(1): 181.

Cartet-Farnier E, Goutelle-Audibert L, Maire P, De la Gastine B, Goutelle S. Implications of using the MDRD or CKD-Epi equation instead of the Cockcroft-Gault equation for estimating renal function and drug dosage adjustment in elderly patients. Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2016; 31(1): 110-11.

Meredith C. Cockcroft Gault formula. Laboratory bulletin. Updates and information from Rex Pathology Laboratory, 2006; 121: 3-4.

Coresh J, Stevens LA. Kidney function estimating equations: Where do we stand?. Curr Opin Nephrol

Hypertens, 2006; 15(3): 276-284.

Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa, Natavudh Townamchai, Tawatchai Chaiwatanarat, Khajohn Tiranathanagul, Katawatin, et al. The need for robust validation for MDRD-based glomerular filtration rate estimation in

various CKD populations. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2011; 26(9): 2780–2785.

Jessani S, Levey AS, Bux R, Inker LA, Islam M, et al. Estimation of GFR in South Asians: A Study from the general population in Pakistan. Am J Kidney Disease, 2014; 63(1): 49–58.

Horio M, Imai E, Yasuda Y, Watanabe T, Matsuo S. Modification of the CKD epidemiology collaboration (CKD-Epi) equation for Japanese: Accuracy and use for population estimates. Am J Kidney Dis, 2010; 56: 32-38.

Downloads

Submitted

2020-02-09

Accepted

2020-09-22

Published

2020-12-07

How to Cite

[1]
Hapsari, S.N. and Anniwati, L. 2020. MDRD, CKD-Epi and Creatinine Clearance with 24-Hour Urine Collection Results in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 27, 1 (Dec. 2020), 66–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v27i1.1628.

Issue

Section

Articles