Diagnostic Value of Encode TB IgG and IgM Rapid Test to Support Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis

Authors

  • Notrisia Rachmayanti Department of Clinical Pathology-Airlangga University
  • Aryati Aryati Department of Clinical Pathology- Airlangga University
  • Tutik Kusmiati Department of Pulmonology and Respiration Medicine- Airlangga University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v26i2.1524

Keywords:

Tuberculosis, immunochromatography, Encode TBIgG, IgM

Abstract

Diagnosis of tuberculosis can be established through the detection of antigens by Acid Fast Bacilli (AFB), microscopy, culture, and Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). The World Health Organization (WHO) 2012 issued a recommendation not to use antibody detection in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. However, there is high demand from clinicians to detect anti-tuberculosis antibody in patients who are challenging to do a bacteriological examination. The purpose of this research was to determine the diagnostic value of anti-M.tuberculosis IgG and IgM Encode TB to support lung tuberculosis diagnosis.
This study was a cross-sectional by using consecutively sampling, which was performed in the Dr. Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, from November 2017 until May 2018. A total of 52 patients were included and evaluated for clinical or bacteriological examination using AFB microscopy or PCR (Gene Xpert) as the gold standard and tested the anti-M.tuberculosis IgG and IgM with immunochromatography. Encode Tuberculosis (TB) IgG was positive in 12 patients from the tuberculosis group and one false-positive in the non-tuberculosis group. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of Encode TB IgG dan IgM were 35%, 94%, 92%, 43% and 55.7%, respectively. The specificity was high that the positive result was considered as TB; the sensitivity was low that the negative results were not excluded from TB. Encode TB IgG/IgM rapid test was not recommended to use as a single diagnostic test and must be combined with other diagnostic tests to increase the sensitivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Notrisia Rachmayanti, Department of Clinical Pathology-Airlangga University

Department of Clinical Pathology-Airlangga University

Aryati Aryati, Department of Clinical Pathology- Airlangga University

Department of Clinical Pathology- Airlangga University

References

WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2017. 2017. 4-5

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No 67 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penanggulangan Tuberkulosis. 2016. 19-21

Jacobs JA, Mongkolsapaya J, Screaton GR et al. Antibodies and Tuberculosis. Elsevier. 2016. 102-113

Godreuil S, Tazi L, Banuls A-L. Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Mycobacterium Tuberculosis : Modern Molecular Epidemiology and Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2007. 1-29

Ongut G, Ogunc D, Gunseren F. Evaluation of The ICT Tuberculosis Test for The Routine Diagnosis of Ttuberculosis. BMC Infectious Disease. 2006: 6(37); 1-4

Tuberculosis IgG/IgM Rapid Test Device Package Insert.2015.

Welch RJ, Lawless K, Litwin CM. Antituberculosis IgG Antibodies as a Marker of Active Mycobacterium tuberculosis Disease. Journals.ASM.org. 2011. 522-526.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-06-13

Accepted

2019-08-06

Published

2020-03-31

How to Cite

[1]
Rachmayanti, N., Aryati, A. and Kusmiati, T. 2020. Diagnostic Value of Encode TB IgG and IgM Rapid Test to Support Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 26, 2 (Mar. 2020), 138–141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v26i2.1524.

Issue

Section

Articles