DIFFERENCE IN HbA1c LEVEL BETWEEN BORONATE AFFINITY AND ION EXCHANGE-HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD IN DIABETIC PATIENT

Authors

  • Tuti Asryani Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.
  • Ellyza Nasrul Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.
  • Rikarni Rikarni Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.
  • Tutty Prihandani Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v25i2.1466

Keywords:

boronate affinity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, HbA1c, ion exchange-HPLC

Abstract

Glycated Hb (HbA1c) test is needed to control glycemic in high prevalence type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients. Hemoglobin fraction separated and chemical reaction is two main concepts in the HbA1c test. Ion exchange-high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and boronate affinity use the first concept. Ion exchange-HPLC is a reference method in most of the clinical laboratory. Point of care testing (POCT) with boronate affinity method that has been standardized by the international institution is available. This study aimed to compare the boronate affinity POCT method and ion exchange-HPLC method. This cross-sectional study was conducted to 22 types 2 DM patients those fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria in January 2017 to February 2018. Level of HbA1c was assayed with boronate affinity POCT and ion exchange-HPLC method. A t-test was used to analyze data and no significant difference if p>0.005. Subjects of this study are females (59.1%) more than males (40.9%) with age mean 59.23 years old (8.1). Uncontrolled type 2 DM (77.3%) more than controlled type 2 DM (22.7%).Mean of HbA1 level was 8.0% (1.7) in boronate affinity POCT and 8.3% (1.8) in ion exchange-HPLC. T-test showed no significant difference between those two HbA1C assay methods (p>0.005). There was no difference HbA1c level between boronate affinity POCT method and ion exchange-HPLC method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Tuti Asryani, Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

Ellyza Nasrul, Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

Rikarni Rikarni, Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

Tutty Prihandani, Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

Department of Clinical Pathology,Faculty of Medicine, Andalas University-Dr.M. Djamil Hospital Padang, Indonesia.

References

Perkeni, 2015. Konsensus Pengelolaan dan Pencegahan Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 di Indonesia 2015. PB Perkeni. Hal: 1-79.

ADA, 2017. Glycemic Targets. In: Diabetes Care. P: 48-56.

Kilpatrick Eric S, 2000. Glycated Haemoglobin In The Year 2000. In: J Clin Pathol. P: 335-39.

Syed Iftikhar A A, 2011. Glycated Haemoglobin; Past, Present and Future Are We Ready For The Change. In: Review Article, J Pak Med Assoc, Ireland. P: 383-87.

NGSP, 2016. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) Standardization of HbA1c. P: 1-4.

Gupta S, Jain U, Chauhan N, 2017. Laboratory Diagnosis of HbA1c: A Review. In: Journal of Nanomedicine Research. P: 1-10.

Little Randie R and Robets William L, 2009. A review of Variant Hemoglobin Interfering With Hemoglobin A1c Measurement. In: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. Vol.3. P: 446-51.

Karami A and Baradaran, 2014. Comparative Evaluation Of Three Different Methods For HbA1c Measurement With High-Performance Chromatography In Diabetic Patient. In: Advanced Biomed Research. P: 1-11.

National Institute for Health Research (NHS), 2016. Point of Care HbA1c Tests- Diagnosis Of Diabetes. Diunduh dari www.oxford.dec.nihr.ac.uk. dilihat pada tanggal 21 Januari 2017.

Genc S, Gurdol F, Kanzamar-Ozer M, Ince N, Ozcelik F et al., 2014. The Analytical Performance of Four Different Glycated Hemoglobin Methods. In: Medical Chemistry. P: 501-05.

Rhea JM and Molinaro R, 2014. Pathology Consultation On HbA1c Methods and Interferences. In: AJCP. P: 5-16.

Razi F, Esfahani E, Farzani M, Tootee A, Qorbani M, et al., 2015. Effect of The Different Assay of HbA1c on Diabetic Patients Monitoring. In: Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. P: 1-4.

Paputungan Sri R dan Sanusi H, 2014. Peranan Pemeriksaan Hemoglobin A1c pada Pengelolaan Diabetes Melitus. Dalam: Cermin Dunia Kedokteran. Vol 41. No 9. Hal: 650–55.

Bode Bruce W, Irvin BJ, Pierce JA, Allen MA, Clark AL, 2007. Advances In Hemoglobin A1c Point of Care Technology. In: Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. Vol.1. P: 405-11.

Schwartz KL, Monsur J, Hammad A, Bartoces MG, Neale AV, 2009. Comparison of Point Of Care and Laboratory HbA1c Analysis: A Metronet Study. In: J Am Board Fam Med. Vol 22. P: 461-63.

Grant DA, Dunseath GJ, Churm, Luzio, 2017. Comparison Of A Point-Of-Care Analyzer For The Determination Of HbA1c With HPLC Method. In: Practical Laboratory Medicine. P: 26-9.

Alcala Garcia H, Arguelles Ruiz A, Carvallo Cedillo B, 2009. Effect of The Method To Measure Levels of Glycated Hemoglobin On Individual Clinical Decisions, Comparison of An Immunoassay With High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. In: American Journal Clinical Pathology. P: 332-5.

Muller A and Jones G, 2013. Evaluation of Four POCT-Systems for The Measurement of HbA1c. In: EKF Diagnostic. P: 1-5.

Ullman M David and Burtis Carl A, 2006. Chromatography. In: Tietz textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 4th Edition. P: 142-161.

Sacks David B and Path C, 2006. Diabetes Mellitus. In: Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. Ed 4th. Elsevier Inc. P: 853-63.

Keohane M Elaine, 2016. Hemoglobin Metabolism. In: Rodak's Hematology Clinical Principle and Application. Ed 5th . P: 124-35.

Downloads

Submitted

2019-02-07

Accepted

2019-03-01

Published

2019-04-13

How to Cite

[1]
Asryani, T., Nasrul, E., Rikarni, R. and Prihandani, T. 2019. DIFFERENCE IN HbA1c LEVEL BETWEEN BORONATE AFFINITY AND ION EXCHANGE-HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD IN DIABETIC PATIENT. INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY AND MEDICAL LABORATORY. 25, 2 (Apr. 2019), 174–179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v25i2.1466.

Issue

Section

Articles